Magnetizer has been in research and developmentof magnetic fluid treatment for over 20 years.  Through the yearswe have refined and defined the techniques and the principles of how totreat fluid with magnets.

When a properly focused magnetic fieldis applied to a hydrogen-based fuel, the hydrogen is converted from thepara (less volatile) to ortho state (more volatile).  This potentiatesfuel so that the hydrogen attracts and bonds with more of the oxygen. (Getting the oxygen to bond with the hydrogen is necessary for completecombustion).  When this happens, we burn more of the fuel and thatreduces exhaust emissions and increases the fuels efficiency (Better fueleconomy and power).

Magnetizer products are easy to install,and can be fitted to virtually all engines in just a few minutes. If one was to try to make a comparison between Magnetizer and catalyticconverters, it is easy to see the marked benefits of Magnetizer.
 

Before

After

Before

After

• VTEC Laboratories – test – 26% drop infuel consumption.

• Preliminary Emissions test by Instituteof Aeronautics (Poland) – 40% CO reduction, 20% HC reduction.
• RV Power Group – Gulf Stream high risefrom 5.34 mpg to 8.08 mpg.
• Bacon Equipment Company – 33% horsepowerincrease (farm tractor).
• J.P. Bethlehem, PA – 12.5% faster ¼mile race time (Corvette).
• Manner Automotive Tech – 10% horsepowerincrease (Chevrolet).
• Penske Racing – 4.8% average horsepowergain (full race engine).
• Tom McCall, Petrochemical Engineer – de-carbonizingof fuel injection system and engine.
• Chile EPA – 18% Fuel savings.
• Chinese test on early prototype Auto FuelEnergizer – 7-10% Fuel savings.
• Tomei Industrial Furnace, Taiwan – reductionof 11.7% of heavy oil used.
• Northern California Diagnostic Laboratoriesreported a 5% increase in horsepower during testing.
• US Border Patrol Test (8/10/95) – 94 ChevySuburban 27.0%, 90 Ford Bronco, 29.8%, 91 Nissan 4 x 4, 10.3%, 86 6.9LDiesel, 50.8%.
• Electrometal Ltd. (7/31/95) – Genset (Motor/Generator)– Saved 25% on Diesel Fuel.
• Wheels Ltd. (11/04/95) – Two Ambassador’sVehicles, increased mileage of rental cars by 17.46% and 18.0% respectively.
• City of Berkeley CA – Fuel Economy change:95 Ford Crown V8, 14.13%, 95 Ford Crown V8 (2.46%), 90 E-350 Ford Van V8,7.06%.

Background:  Three vehicles, two petroland one diesel, at Hurlburt Field, Florida, were removed from service,exhaust gas emissions were tested for pollutants, and MONO-POLE (singlepole) magnetic units were fitted.  The vehicles were allowed to runfor 10 minutes, then gas emissions were tested again.  Dramatic improvementsin harmful emissions were noted.  To ensure continuity in testing,the same mechanic performed all emission tests using the Bear 2000 seriesdiagnostic analyzer, EPA approved and calibrated equipment.  All testswere carried out with engines at operating temperature.
 
 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
(Latin America)

Magnetizer CVS-75 Test Summary

 The measuring process used is theone established by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency, USA).

 A reduction in the consumption wasnot tested, but stoichimetrically, there must be a substantial reductionin consumption.

VTEC LABORATORIES, Inc. - Germany &USA
Fuel Efficiency Tests of the MagnetizerFuel Energizer

1.0          Test Description
The described test was conducted insidea large facility under controlled conditions.  The exhaust gasseswere vented outside the building.  All the parameters of the testwere kept constant throughout the program.

1.1         Test Set Up
A Kohler generator was connected to anexternal graduated fuel tank that was kept at approximately the same heightas the carburetor of the generator.  A calibrated flow meter was insertedbetween the fuel tank and the generator.  A load bank consisting oflights and heater was attached to the generator.  The generator wasplaced on a small table approximately 30 inches above the floor.

1.2          The Generator

An electric portable Kohler generator withthe following specifications was used for this project:

Model 3.5 mm65
S/N 260058
KVA 3.5
3600 RP
Watts 3500

The load bank consisted of five 300 wattlight bulbs and a 900 watt heater which was approximately at 70% load. Each load source had an electrical plug at the end of the wire which wasplugged into the generator.

The generator had two receptacles ratedat 120 Volt, 15 Amp maximum.  Each receptacle had a load bank pluggedinto it.

No adjustments were made to the generatorprior to the start of the test program.

1.3            Flowmeter

A separate line was run from the remotefuel tank directly to the carburetor with a flowmeter and a 12 inch steelline that ran in between to make the attachment of the MAGNETIZER unit. The fuel pump was by-passed.  The flowmeter was manufactured by BrooksInstruments with the following specifications:

S/N   99223
Tube Number  R-215-A
Metering viscosity 0.640 cS
Date of Calibration 6.28.90
Flow Range   0.011 to 1.025(liq) gal/hrs

The gasoline used was CITGO unleaded 87octane.

1.4          Exhaust Gas Analyzer

The exhaust gas from the generator wasanalyzed for oxygen and carbon monoxide.  A stainless steel tube wasinserted in the exhaust pipe of the generator.  The gas analysis wasthrough a system that had a pump to draw the gasses and a cold trap/drieritesystem to remove the water.

Gasses were continually drawn through thesystem with continuous display readings.  The following gas analysisequipment was used:

Servomex Oxygen Analyzer Model 540A
Horiba Carbon Monoxide Analyzer ModelPIR-2000

2.0          Results

The generator was operated for three daysbefore the described test results were obtained.  This was done inan effort to “break-in” the engine and work out any problems that couldresult prior to testing.  Readings were taken as required when theMAGNETIZER was installed and then removed.  The generator was runcontinuously.  The results are for two sets of runs.
 

 W-W/O     W -indicates with magnet installed                  W/O - indicates without magnet installed
 

Each time the MAGNETIZER was removed oradded, it was necessary to re-adjust the carburetor.

Based on the above information, the MAGNETIZERdevice for this test reduced the fuel consumption by approximately 26%.

Summary

At MAGNETIZER, we are quite pleased withthe V-TEC Laboratories test resulting in a 26% drop in fuel consumptionachieved through the use of our Fuel Energizer.

What is truly amazing is the reductionin gasoline consumption while the electrical output of the gasoline drivengenerator remained almost perfectly constant.  The wattage, a productof amps time volts, varied from the average of 2491 watts by less thanone percent.  It should be noted that maximum wattage occurred whenthe generator was equipped with a MAGNETIZER.  During this run, thecarbon monoxide was at its lowest level.  This is to be expected sincecarbon monoxide is oxidized to carbon dioxide.  With any internalcombustion engine, maximum output will occur when carbon monoxide is minimizedand carbon dioxide is maximized which is in accordance with stoichiometricprinciples.

In using a gasoline driven generator, theelectrical load can be matched to the output very closely, as indicatedabove.  Vehicular testing with friction and mechanical transmissiondifficulties could not have generated such precise results.

The MAGNETIZER unit was mounted on a 12”length of steel tubing.  It is possible that the slight improvementin fuel economy in the fourth run after the MAGNETIZER was due to residualmagnetism.  However, the variation between MAGNETIZER equipped runsand non-MAGNETIZER runs were so large as to make the results of residualmagnetization inconsequential.  Future runs should be conducted utilizinga non-ferrous gas line.  Since the lines of magnetic force penetratethese materials easier, the results will be higher than the 26% resultsthat we have already achieved.

Results were conducted on test equipmentcalibrated to the National Institute for Standards testing requirement,formerly The National Bureau of Standards.

•     Fuel Consumptiondecreased by 3.29%.

•     Exhaust Emissionsat idling Carbon Monoxide (CO) decreased by 10.4% and Hydrocarbon 
      (HC) decreasedby 4.3%.
•     Exhaust Emissionsat 90 km/h Carbon Monoxide (CO) decreased by 29.2% and Hydrocarbon 
      (HC) decreasedby 22.4%.
•     Power outputincreased by 6.6%.

TEST SUMMARY:

•   Fuel Consumption decreasedby 6.62%.

•   Exhaust Emissions at idlingCarbon Monoxide (CO) decreased by 14.3% and Hydrocarbon 
    (HC) decreased by 16.6%.

•   Exhaust Emissions at 90 km/hCarbon Monoxide (CO) decreased by 22.7% and Hydrocarbon 
    (HC) decreased by 22.6%.
 

 TEST SUMMARY:

•   Fuel Consumption decreasedby 6.11%.

•   Exhaust Emissions at idlingCarbon Monoxide (CO) decreased by 100% and Hydrocarbon 
    (HC) decreased by 67%.

•   Exhaust Emissions at 90 km/hCarbon Monoxide (CO) and Hydrocarbon (HC) remain the 
    same. 

•   Power output increased by2.3%.

EPA Test/ SRI LANKA (Ceylon)

Magnetizer Diesel Smoke Opacity EmissionTest conducted at 
United Motor Car, Sri Lanka (Ceylon)

(Importer of Mitsubishi Motor Cars)

Magnetizer Diesel Smoke Opacity EmissionTest
(Conducted by Sri Lanka(Ceylon) EPA)

Vehicle One

     Date:           May 17, 1999

     Model:         Isuzu Pick Up Truck 
                        (Owned by Managing Director of Department of Transportation, Sri Lanka(Ceylon))

Lucas Hartridge Free Acceleration TestEEC72/306

Before Magnetizer EES:           30.1 HSU (opacity) Average

After Magnetizer EES:               11.8 HSU (opacity) Average

Diesel Emission Reduction: 60.7%

Vehicle Two

Date:               May 17, 1999

Model:             Toyota Pick Up Truck
   (Owned by Director of SriLankan (Ceylon) EPA)

Lucas Hartridge Free Acceleration TestEEC72/306

Before Magnetizer EES:          56.4 HSU (Opacity) Average

After Magnetizer EES:             21.7 HSU (Opacity) Average

Diesel Emission Reduction:    61.2%

Nepal Magnetizer – Emissions Testing

Date:                                           April/May 1999

Magnetizer                                  Intercraft Pvt., Ltd.
Representative:                          Kathmandu, Nepal

Test Equipment:                         Nepal – EPA – Protocol

Presented Technical Men:        Commissioner Motor Traffic – Nepal

Emission Testing of Petrol Vehicles

Emission Testing of Diesel Vehicles

TEST DATE:  3-12-97

ORGANIZATION:  Locomotive andCar Research Institute, China Academy of 
                                 Railway Science

MODEL:  Tung Fong 4, Serial# 2502  Locomotive

FUEL:  Diesel

During the test period, from June 1996to March 1997, the average savings were 4.88%, with the peak speed at 120km/hr.  In the month of April 1997 the peak speed rose to 160 km/hrwith average fuel savings of 5.91%.  The highest recorded savingswith the Magnetizer was 9.11% in December 1996.

As related in the bar diagram, it tookapproximately 3 months (or 90 days) to see a meaningful reduction in fuelusage.  Also, at the first maintenance inspection after Magnetizerunits were utilized, it was found that the diesel injectors had less carbonand the residue that remained was soft.

The conversion of hard carbon depositsinto a softer form is to be expected, since chemical producers of carbonblock use magnetized fuel to produce a finer, softer form of carbon.

The conversion of hard carbon depositsto soft carbon residue is helpful in increasing useful engine life.

BRAZIL BUS TEST

Agency – CREA – PA  BRAZIL  (EPA Testing)

Results:
         Without Magnetizer 2.874 Km/L
         With Magnetizer 3.452 Km/L
         Fuel Savings  20.11%

Substantial reduction in diesel exhaustwas noted but no data or opacity was provided.

Original full test in file
 

BRAZIL:

TRANSPORTE SÃO LUIZ - ANALISEDISCO TACOGRAFO 
25-10-03/23-11-03

     •  O ônibus 407 após o segundo teste,  fez 9,36% a maisde economia em relação aos 
         ônibus       323-325, sem magnetizer.
     •  No primeiro teste  o ônibus 325 com Sistema Magnetizer instaladofez 10% a mais de 
        economia em relação ao ônibus 407, o contrárioque aconteceu no segundo teste.
     •  A conclusão dos 2 (dois) teste mostra que o Sistema Magnetizer instaladonos dois 
        diferentes ônibus por 28 dias para teste, fez  cada um 10% deeconomia. A prova é clara 
        que o  Sistema Magnetizer age conforme as declaraçõesdos fabricantes, alem da 
        economia reduz a emissão dos poluentes  e fumaça pretado diesel. 
 
 

1983 FORD F-100 – 158,000 MILES

CARBURETED, 300 C.I., STRAIGHT 6 CYLINDER

AFE-1 ADDED AT 41,000 MILES, TCE ADDEDAT 67,000 MILES

Neither engine nor radiator has had anyrepairs prior to this tear down due to a broken piston skirt.  Engineinspected by Performance Machine Shop, Austin, Texas.  Tear down andassembly done by Quality Automotive, Geronimo, Texas.  Inspectionand photos by master mechanic, Paul Harborth (210-379-0581).

PHOTO #1: Water jacket inspection afterremoval of water pump.  Normally an engine with this many miles lookslike a cavern full of stalactites from pitting and scale.  Water jacketrequires no acidizing.

PHOTO #2: Face of valves showing no carbonbuild-up.  Original head gasket still in place.  Notice cleanwater jacket and spark plug holes.

PHOTO #3: Top view of piston in the block. No carbon build-up.  A perfect valve seating indentation is stillclearly visible in the recess of the piston.  No build-up in the waterjacket holes.  Notice the original Ford inspection stamp still on the engine block.

PHOTO #4: After removal of the piston,cylinder walls still perfect due to no grit from carbon allowed to getinto the oil.

All parties concerned in the evaluationof this engine found it difficult to believe this engine, with this manymiles, was still in this good of condition.  This engine was stillin perfect working order and never used any oil between routine changes. This tear down was due entirely to a broken piston skirt.

Magnetizer created a break-through solutionas long ago as 1986 when it developed the monopole EPM  Engine PerformanceMaximizer.

The Magnetizer Engine Performance Maximizerhas been called "one of the finest innovations in engine maintenance."

EPMs are currently being used and recognizedby many authorities such as the US Air Force, State, Federal and InternationalGovernments. Municipalities such as the California's Berkeley Police andthe Berkeley Sanitation Department also employ these systems to createcleaner air and save a great deal of fuel and money.

As indicated by a recent California EmissionsTest (shown in the graph above), the Hydrocarbons were reduced by 84%,the Carbon Monoxide was reduced by 83%, and the Nitrous Oxide was reducedby 72%! Once Magnetizer's EPM (Engine Performance Maximizer) stabilizesbetween 200-500 miles, the emissions almost completely disappear.

Magnetizer also manufactures fuel systemsfor homes and industry that save money and enable dirty smokestacks toburn clean.